The Bonn Agreement (officially the agreement on interim arrangements in Afghanistan until permanent government institutions were restored) was the first set of agreements adopted on 5 December 2001 to restore the State of Afghanistan after the US invasion of Afghanistan in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In the absence of a national government since 1979 in Afghanistan, it was deemed necessary to have a transition period before a permanent government was established. A nationally agreed government would require the convening of at least one jirga de loya; However, in the absence of law and order following the rapid victory of the armed forces of the North American and Afghan alliance, immediate action was taken to prove necessary. The roadmap for state-building, established by the Bonn Agreement, was an inappropriate model for the case of Afghanistan and subsequently led to a number of issues, including corruption and government incompetence. As the Bonn agreement does not provide for shared powers within the Afghan government, it has encouraged an internal war between two of the country`s “elite networks”, the Northern Alliance and the Pashtun group. As a result, the Northern Alliance held most ministerial positions in the Afghan government and had a great deal of decision-making capacity. This insensity of political power and abundant internal rivalries were noted in an early World Bank report, which said: “Even within the central government, the current political divisions and rivalries make it impossible to reach a reasonable consensus on even the most important political elements of a broad programme of administrative reforms…  The subsequent failures of the Afghan state, including the inability to provide basic social and security services, are the result of the “overvolunted reconstruction model” put in place by the Bonn Agreement and practical challenges on the ground.  As a result of this event, the Afghan government adopted a more informal style in public affairs of the implementation of the pact and mediation. Therefore, the Bonn agreement can be seen as a major setback in afghanistan`s development as a state and its coexisting political climate.  The Bonn Agreement has several political levels that govern its operation. First, the agreement itself, originally signed in 1969 and regularly updated since then, which defines the legal basis of the organization and its work.
The Bonn agreement called for the creation of a Supreme Court in Afghanistan. The Bonn agreement is the oldest regional agreement reached by governments to deal with pollution. Ott, S.E. The Bonn agreement on the Kyoto Protocol paves the way for ratification. International Environmental Agreements: Policy, Law and Economy 1, 469-476 (2001). doi.org/10.1023/A:1013325120260. Brouns, B. and T. Santarius (2001), “Kyoto Reduction Goals After bonn Decisions,” daily energy issues 51 (9), 590-591. Instant online access to all topics from 2019. The subscription is automatically renewed each year. Marine Crime Seminar 6-7 March 2018 at Europa Hotel in Scheveningen The seminar focuses on violations of the maritime environment in the event of non-compliance with MARPOL`s Annexes II and VI.
The Bonn Agreement is the mechanism with which ten governments work with the European Union to combat pollution of the North Sea by hydrocarbons and other pollutants. The agreement is signed between the governments of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as well as the European Union.
Categorised in: Uncategorized
This post was written by ammoore