In 1999, the United Kingdom formally requested participation in certain provisions of the Schengen acquis – Title III on police security and judicial cooperation – in 1999, and this request was adopted by the Council of the European Union on 29 May 2000.  The UK`s formal participation in previously approved areas of cooperation was brought into effect by a 2004 Council decision that came into force on 1 January 2005.  Although the United Kingdom was not part of the Schengen area, it has always used the Schengen information system, a government database used by European countries to store and disseminate information on individuals and goods. This has allowed the UK to exchange information with countries that are part of the Schengen Agreement, often to connect to legal proceedings.  In 2020, the United Kingdom has declared that it will withdraw from these agreements at the end of its transition period. With my family in both jurisdictions, I was a frequent flyer on this line on the lawn in the 1980s and 1990s. Even then, at the height of the riots, there was no demand for a passport, although British army checkpoints often searched cars. Today, the check-points are gone, and the only thing that should draw the traveller`s attention to the fact that he has crossed the border is to pass from one kilometer to another on the traffic signs to the north, and the fact that the roads in the Republic are now superior. The additional obligations imposed by European law on national border authorities with regard to the treatment of third-country travellers (for example. B the requirement to mark their travel documents) should not prevent the development of automated border control systems made available to these travellers. As the above examples of automated border control systems developed at border crossings in the Schengen area show, national border authorities have been able to adapt the organisation of their automated border control systems to allow third-country nationals to use them. One solution is to set up a border guard that is physically placed next to automated borders and can affix travel documents to the needs: this approach has been adopted by Finnish border guards at the automated border gates of Helsinki airport. in which the legitimate user (who must receive a passport stamp) holds an Australian holder, biometric passports Canadian, Japanese, New Zealand, South Korean and United States, as well as by The Servio de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras of Portugal, are at the automated gates of Lisbon Airport, where legitimate users (who must receive a stamp) hold Angolan and Brazilian passports and hold diplomatic and service passports.
This approach has also been applied in Italy, where legitimate eGates users hold biometric passports from Australia, Canada, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, the United States and the Vatican. A similar but slightly different solution was adopted by the Dutch Royal Marechaussee on the Privium iris recognition automated border gates at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (where registered users registered in the EU/EEA/Swiss, U.S. citizens who are members of the global entry and all nationals holding diplomatic passports), as well as automated automated entry doors of the ABG Plus iris Federal Police at Frankfurt Airport (where authorized users are EU/EEA/Swiss citizens and U.S. citizens, if eligible third-country nationals use Privium/ABG Plus after scanning and checking their irises, another door opens to that of EU/EEA/Swiss citizens and the third country national is referred to a trail that places them at the head of the queue for manual passport checks at the immigration counters. where the border guard stamps the user`s passport.
Categorised in: Uncategorized
This post was written by ammoore