The main advantage for a landowner is that an independent third party bears all the risks and costs associated with granting a building permit, while a major disadvantage is the loss of control of the land. The reason is that the land is “linked” for the duration of the option contract (which could last 5 or 10 years – or even longer depending on the length of time negotiated), which prevents the landowner from freely selling the land to a third party. Under this agreement, a developer assumes responsibility for securing the building permit and also has the option to purchase the land at a given point (usually once the planning is complete). The purchase of the developer is made at an agreed price that generally reflects the market value of the land, net of compensation for the guarantee of the building permit and perhaps instead of a levy that would otherwise have been levied. Options are usually time sensitive and a fee can be paid to back up the option, as well as extend it if necessary. The main advantage of a landowner is that his interest is entirely oriented towards the developer in order to get the best possible price for the country, while a developer who buys under option strives to pay the lowest possible price. Although the owner wishes to play a more active role in monitoring or supporting the assistance process, he is not required to do so and therefore does not have to risk his own resources. Consortium agreements (increasingly called cooperation agreements) are a mechanism for a group of landowners to eliminate potential conflicts between them when it comes to planning a development program for multiple landowners. In return for the work and expense incurred by the proponent at its own risk (the authorization not obtained before the agreed date of the Longstop, The contract continues without the developer`s costs being reimbursed), the developer receives his payment and reward if the land is sold (the developer being reimbursed for the design and marketing costs on the gross proceeds of the sale and the owner of the land rewarding him for his success by a share (prorated or prorated) of the proceeds of the net sale. There are differences between the two and the differences in thinking on a subject (for example. B hybrid agreements) and there are potentially significant problems/costs that need to be understood and managed if you want to mitigate them and achieve the most appropriate and effective tax result. – Can be built between the owner and the developer, not necessarily a developer.
- The developer assesses the adequacy of the land, establishes plans, verifies viability with the local authority and obtains planning permissions for the landowner to be for sale.
Categorised in: Uncategorized
This post was written by ammoore